登录 | 注册 | 充值 | 退出 | 公司首页 | 繁体中文 | 满意度调查
综合馆
一般会话含义的"两面性"与含义推导模式问题
  • 摘要

    本文从一般会话含义的性质出发,讨论格赖斯会话含义理论模式存在的缺陷,同时考察继格赖斯之后现存含义推导模式在解释一般会话含义方面的不足,最后提出了后格赖斯语用学在解释一般会话含义时遇到的几个理论问题:一般会话含义的性质问题、规约和认知的作用问题、语义解释和语用解释问题.文章指出,引发这些理论之争的根本原因在于一般会话含义既有规约性也有非规约性的"两面性",因此,如何对一般会话含义提供合理的解释便成为后格赖斯语用学中最棘手的问题.

  • 作者

    张绍杰 

  • 作者单位

    东北师范大学

  • 刊期

    2008年3期 PKU CSSCI

  • 关键词

    一般会话含义  含义推导模式  后格赖斯语用学 

参考文献
  • [1] 格赖斯也注意到某些含义的"默认特征",见Atlas(2005,52,60.
  • [2] Atlas,J;C.Levinson. It-clefts,informativeness,and logical from. New York:Academic Press,Inc, 1981
  • [3] Bach,K. Conversational implicature. Mind and Language, 1994
  • [4] Bezuidenhout,A. Generalized conversational implicatures and default pragmatic inferences. New York/London:Seven Bridges Press, 2002
  • [5] Blakemore,D. Constraints on interpretations. Berkeley:Berkeley Linguistics Society, 1990
  • [6] Borg,E. Intention-based semantics. Oxford:Oxford University Press, 2006
  • [7] Borg,E. Minimalism versus contextualism in semantics. Oxford:Oxford University Press, 2007
  • [8] Brown,P;S.Levinson. Universals in language usage:Politeness phenomena. Cambridge:Cambridge University Press, 1978
  • [9] Carston,R. Implicature,explicature,and truth-theoretic semantics. Cambridge:Cambridge University Press, 1988
  • [10] Chapman,S. Paul Grice,Philosopher and Linguist. New York:Palgrave Macmillan, 2005
  • [11] Davis,W. Implicature,Intention,Convention,and Principle in the Failure of Gricean Theory. Cambridge:Cambridge University Press, 1998
  • [12] 格赖斯是日常语言哲学学派的代表人物之一,但他不满意奥斯汀研究自然语言中语词用法所采用的过于细腻、繁琐和僵化的分析方法,60年代后期移居美国在加州伯克利大学执教,学术思想受到奎因(Quine)和乔姆斯基(Chomsky)的影响,以致后来提出了具有普遍意义的会话含义理论.见Chapman(2005.
  • [13] Grice,P. Logic and conversation. New York:Academic Press,Inc, 1975
  • [14] Grice,P. Studies in the Way of Words. Cambridge:harvard University Press, 1989
  • [15] Haugh,M. The intuitive basis of implicature:Relevance theoretic implicitness versus Gricean implying. Pragmatics, 2002
  • [16] Horn,L. Toward a new taxonomy for pragmatic inference:Q-and R-based implicature. Washington,DE:Georgetown University Press, 1984
  • [17] Huang,Y. Pragmatics. Oxford:Oxford University Press, 2007
  • [18] Jaszczolt,K. Default Semantics:Foundations of a Compositional Theory of Acts of Communication. Oxford:Oxford University Press, 2005
  • [19] Kamp.H;U.Reyle. From Discourse to Logic. Dordrecht:Kluwer Publishing, 1993
  • [20] "隐型含义"是Bach创造的术语,译为隐型含义以表示是隐性含义的一种类型.根据Bach(1994)的解释,隐型含义是隐含在所言中的意义,精确地说,是从所言的话语中经过语义扩充推导出来的.例如:Mary has a boyfriend.它的隐型含义是"玛丽只有一个朋友(不多不少)".但其他可能的含义要根据语境来确定.
  • [21] Leech,N. Principles of Pragmatics. London:Longman, 1983
  • [22] Levinson.S. Minimization and conversational inferenee. Amsterdam:John Benjamins, 1987
  • [23] Levinson,S. Pragmatics and the grammar of anaphora.A partial pragmatic reduction of binding and control phenomena. Journal of Linguistics, 1987
  • [24] Levinson,S. Generalized conversational implicature and semantics/pragmatics interface. Department of Linguistics,Stanford University, 1988
  • [25] Horn,L. On the Semantic Properties of Logical Operators in English. Bloomington:Indiana University Linguistics Club, 1972
  • [26] Horn,L. The border wars:A neo-Griccan perspective. Oxford:Elsevier, 2006
  • [27] Horn,L. New-Gricean pragmatics:A Manichaean Manifesto. Basingstoke:Palgrave, 2007
  • [28] Levinson,S. Pragmatic reduction of the binding conditions revisited. Journal of Linguistics, 1991
  • [29] Recanati,F. Literal Meaning. Cambridge:Cambridge University Press, 2004
  • [30] Sag,I. Formal semantics and extralinguistic context. New York:Academic Press,Inc, 1981
  • [31] 关于新格赖斯会话含义理论国内早已介绍并开展过专题研究,见徐盛桓(1993)、张绍杰(1995).应该指出的是,新格赖斯语用学内部存在着分歧,比如Horn认为一般会话含义都是说话人意义,不赞同用Levinson(2000)提出的默认推论模式给以解释.
  • [32] Sperber,D;D.Wilson. Relevance:Communication and Cognition. Oxford:Basil:Biackwell, 1995
  • [33] Wilson.D;D.Sperber. Representation and relevance. Cambridge:Cambridge University Press, 1988
  • [34] Zipf,G. Human Behaviour and the Principle of Least Effort. Cambridge:Addison-Wesley Press, 1949
  • [35] 徐盛桓. 会话含意理论的新发展. 现代外语, 1993,02
  • [36] 张绍杰. 会话含义理论的新发展. 外语教学与研究, 1995,01
  • [37] 关于关联理论对于格赖斯语用学批判的其他观点,详见Sperber & Wilson(1986/1995:24,36,38,162.
  • [38] 关联:交际与认知.
  • [39] 继格赖斯后,解释会话含义的理论一般都是简约论,尽量缩减会话原则的数量,以使语用学理论具有更大的解释力和给予心理学解释的可能性,而Leech增多了语用原则的数量,因而受到学界的批评.见Chapman(2005:205.
  • [40] Jaszczolt. 默认语义学. 2005
  • [41] Atlas,J. Logic,Meaning,and Conversation. Oxford:Oxford University Press, 2005
  • [42] Levinson,S. Three levels of meaning. Cambridge:Cambridge University Press, 1995
  • [43] Levinson,S. Presumptive Meanings:The Theory of Generalized Conversational Implicature. Cambridge,ma:the Mit Press, 2000
  • [44] Recanati,F. The Pragmatics of what is said. Mind and Language, 1989
查看更多︾
相似文献 查看更多>>
您的IP是: 54.224.91.58